The Apostle Paul calls us Jars of Clay (2 Corinthians 4:7). As followers of Jesus we must allow the Word of God to fill us with it's message of Truth and Grace. In this way, we become a "vessel for honor, sanctified, useful to the Master, prepared for every good work" (2 Timothy 2:21).

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Without Blame - July 10, 2016 sermon






By Pastor Greg

I’ve noticed that people will sometimes ask mighty strange questions from time to time.  Take, for instance, some of the questions asked by attorneys in court.  According to transcripts by court recorders, lawyers have asked, “Was that the same nose you broke as a child?” or, “Was it you or your brother that was killed in the war?”  Interrogating a woman, a lawyer asked, “Mrs. Jones, do you believe you are emotionally stable?  Answer: I used to be.  Q: How many times have you committed suicide?”  This one, however, is my favorite.  “Q: Do you recall approximately the time that you examined the body of Mr. Edington at the Rose Chapel?  A: It was in the evening. The autopsy started about 8:30 p.m.  Q: And Mr. Edington was dead at the time, is that correct?  A: yes. Q: How do you know?  A: Because his brain was in a jar on my desk.  Q: But is it possible that Mr. Edington was still alive?  A: Yes, I suppose it is possible that he was alive and practicing law somewhere.
Of course, lawyers are not the only ones to ask rather strange questions.  Even politicians say things that don’t always make sense.  Christians do as well.  For example, if you read John nine, you will see a number of characters in this story - Jesus, the blind man, and the disciples - however, let’s look at this event through the eyes of the disciples.  See if you can find the “odd question” they ask.
(John 9:1-7) As Jesus was walking along, he saw a man who had been blind from birth. “Rabbi,” his disciples asked him, “why was this man born blind? Was it because of his own sins or his parents’ sins?” “It was not because of his sins or his parents’ sins,” Jesus answered. “This happened so the power of God could be seen in him. We must quickly carry out the tasks assigned us by the one who sent us. The night is coming, and then no one can work. But while I am here in the world, I am the light of the world.” Then he spit on the ground, made mud with the saliva, and spread the mud over the blind man’s eyes. He told him, “Go wash yourself in the pool of Siloam” (Siloam means “sent”). So the man went and washed and came back seeing! [1]
Did you see the illogical question?  They wondered whose sin caused this man’s tragedy.  They wondered if God was punishing the parents or, as crazy as it sounds, whether the boy had sinned in the womb.  After all, he was born blind, meaning it was necessary for him to have sinned while still an unborn child.  To sin before being born sounds crazy to you and me, but the Jewish culture actually felt this was plausible.  Since blindness was viewed as a form of God’s punishment, then someone must have sinned.  Sure, a person who sins is often forced to deal with the consequences.  However, in this case, logic tells us that the boy’s blindness must have come from his parent’s sin – God punishing the child, not the parent.  I mean, how is it possible for an unborn child to sin against God or sin against another human.  That’s why the only logical conclusion is to blame the parents.  Yet even this conclusion is incorrect because of what God had spoken through Ezekiel.  In Ezekiel 18:4 the Lord says, “The person who sins is the one who will die.”  If mom or dad sinned, they would be held accountable, not the boy.  Anyway, the disciples saw an opportunity to learn something, and just wanted to know who was to blame.
That’s an odd question if you ask me.  These believers look at someone who is suffering and ask “why” rather than asking “what can be done about his suffering.”  That would have been a better question.  I mean, even though the theology of the disciples is messed up, at least they could have asked, “Since this man is blind, and since blindness is God’s punishment for sin (that’s the messed up theology), and since there is no cure for his blindness, how will this man ever be restored back to God”.  That would have been a better question.  Then Jesus could have answered, “This is why I came – to remove the effects of sin”.
I think it’s odd that everyone wanted to know why instead of asking Jesus what could be done.  I mean, this man was reminded of sin every day.  With no cure for his blindness, he had to believe there was no cure for the sin that separated him from God.  I think this is why Jesus tells the crowd that the power of God might be seen in him (the blind man).  “Watch what God can do,” says Jesus.  While He still has the opportunity, God can remove the effects of sin and draw people to Himself.  Not only did Jesus heal this man physically, but He would also later address the sin that separated this man from God.
That’s the real point in this miracle.  Instead of fussing about “who”, Jesus quickly carried out the task assigned by God.  This man’s blindness represents the sin that has separated humanity from God.  So Jesus does what He was sent to do – to remove the effects of sin.  To set the captives free.  This man’s dilemma runs in the background of everyone’s life.  What cure do we have for the sin that separates us from God?  Since we cannot cure ourselves, God sends Jesus to overcome the results of Adam’s disobedience (which is sin and death – Romans 5:12).  Jesus demonstrated through this man the “Works God would accomplish through the Son”.  The Son would remove the effects of sin.  The Son would eliminate the penalty of sin.  God sent Jesus to remove the sin that “blinds us” so nothing might separate us from God.

I think the Church needs to learn a lesson from this story.  You see, we Christians today are the disciples of yesterday.  We are the ones walking with Jesus through the streets and the backroads.  We are the people who see the blind and the lame in this world.  We see their suffering.  We see the effects of sin in their life.  We recognize their separation from God.  However, just like the disciples, we should spend less time trying to figure out “why” and more time looking for ways to alleviate the suffering and sadness in those living around us.  Instead of blaming a person’s pain on the anger of God, and trying to figure out who to blame, maybe we should be looking for ways to work in their lives while there is still time.  We need to be more concerned about who we can help rather than why they need our help in the first place. 
As Christians, you and I have a tremendous opportunity to represent Jesus to those still living in darkness.  We have a chance to show this world just how much God loves them.  We can address their physical needs and their spiritual needs.  However, to accomplish these things, we need to concentrate more on how we can help and less on who is to blame.
That’s the real lesson Jesus teaches here. 

[1] Tyndale House Publishers. (2007). Holy Bible: New Living Translation (3rd ed.) (Jn 9:1–7). Carol Stream, IL.

No comments: